Pushkin recites. A painting by the great Repin |
June 3, 2012
Only I understand my own poetry.
If I read another poet
and get to the end of the poem
without being bored,
that makes her
a good poet.
People tell me that William Butler Yeats
was a great poet but I'll be damned if I
understand him.
There are poets who play games with words
in such a way that the poetry bends the wind
so that it ties knots in itself.
Listeners are embarrassed at their lack of
comprehension.
So they applaud, to hide their gullibility,
and the poet goes on to become a great poet with audiences at colleges and
books on shelves at stores.
Another kind of poet writes in plain English
but, god help us, the poems rhyme, or they
use words like Wind, or Clouds, or Geese,
or Mountains.
use words like Wind, or Clouds, or Geese,
or Mountains.
For god's sake write in plain English. Or
French.
Or Serbo-Croatian.
Let's start again.
I love MY poems. I love Pablo Neruda's poems, just because I do.
e.e. cummings? Hey, come on. What a
goofball.
And Bukowsky; that's as close
to real as poetry ever gets.
Mary Oliver is obviously wise;
Wise poets fill me with envy. I'd like to be wise and not just barking mad.
I don't read very much poetry. There's such a to-do over it, but poets rarely get paid.
Rich poets are always terrible. It isn't about the poetry. It's about the poet. We need poets,
Rich poets are always terrible. It isn't about the poetry. It's about the poet. We need poets,
badly, desperately. But we don't need poetry at all.
So I guess the best thing
is to be a poet who doesn't write.
Just don't tell anyone about me.
No comments:
Post a Comment
If you have enjoyed any of my work, please leave a short comment. It may not appear immediately because it comes to me first for moderation. I get a lot of spam. Your comments help raise my spirits and support my belief that someone cares enough to say so.